improve explanation of jemalloc size classes
parent
ac99282773
commit
5b048a28c2
17
README.md
17
README.md
|
@ -309,12 +309,17 @@ metadata.
|
|||
The slab slot count for each size class is not yet finely tuned beyond choosing values avoiding
|
||||
internal fragmentation for slabs (i.e. avoiding wasted space due to page size rounding).
|
||||
|
||||
The choice of size classes is the same as jemalloc, but with a much different approach to the
|
||||
slabs containing them:
|
||||
|
||||
> size classes are multiples of the quantum [16], spaced such that there are four size classes for
|
||||
> each doubling in size, which limits internal fragmentation to approximately 20% for all but the
|
||||
> smallest size classes
|
||||
The choice of size classes for slab allocation is the same as jemalloc, which
|
||||
is a careful balance between minimizing internal and external fragmentation. If
|
||||
there are more size classes, more memory is wasted on free slots available only
|
||||
to allocation requests of those sizes (external fragmentation). If there are
|
||||
fewer size classes, the spacing between them is larger and more memory is
|
||||
wasted due to rounding up to the size classes (internal fragmentation). There
|
||||
are 4 special size classes for the smallest sizes (16, 32, 48, 64) that are
|
||||
simply spaced out by the minimum spacing (16). Afterwards, there are four size
|
||||
classes for every power of two spacing which results in bounding the internal
|
||||
fragmentation below 20% for each size class. This also means there are 4 size
|
||||
classes for each doubling in size.
|
||||
|
||||
| size class | worst case internal fragmentation | slab slots | slab size | internal fragmentation for slabs |
|
||||
| - | - | - | - | - |
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue